Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076
Contig Overview
Unigenes
This contig is part of the following unigenes:
Relationships
The following EST feature(s) are a part of this contig:
Analyses
This contig is derived from or has results from the following analyses
Alignments
The following features are aligned
Homology
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. SwissProt
Match: PR1_ARATH (Pathogenesis-related protein 1 OS=Arabidopsis thaliana GN=At2g14610 PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 154.836 bits (390), Expect = 1.236e-37 Identity = 67/100 (67.00%), Postives = 81/100 (81.00%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 RLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 389 +L+ NC+++HS GPYGENLAWGSGD++G AVNMW+ EK YNY +N+C CGHYTQVVWR SVR+GCAKV+CNNG TIISCNYDP GNY ++PY Sbjct: 65 QLRGNCRLIHSGGPYGENLAWGSGDLSGVSAVNMWVSEKANYNYAANTCNG--VCGHYTQVVWRKSVRLGCAKVRCNNG-GTIISCNYDPRGNYVNEKPY 161
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. SwissProt
Match: PR1C_TOBAC (Pathogenesis-related protein 1C OS=Nicotiana tabacum PE=2 SV=3) HSP 1 Score: 153.295 bits (386), Expect = 3.597e-37 Identity = 68/102 (66.67%), Postives = 82/102 (80.39%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGD-ITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 ++L A+C +VHS G YGENLAWGSGD +T AV MW+ EK+YY ++SN+CA G CGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCA+V+CNNG I+SCNYDPPGN G+ PY Sbjct: 68 SQLAADCNLVHSHGQYGENLAWGSGDFLTAAKAVEMWVNEKQYYAHDSNTCAQGQVCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCARVQCNNG-GYIVSCNYDPPGNVIGKSPY 168
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. SwissProt
Match: PR1A_TOBAC (Pathogenesis-related protein 1A OS=Nicotiana tabacum PE=1 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 152.525 bits (384), Expect = 6.136e-37 Identity = 67/102 (65.69%), Postives = 83/102 (81.37%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGD-ITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 ++L A+C +VHS G YGENLA GSGD +T AV MW+ EK+YY+++SN+CA G CGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCA+V+CNNG ++SCNYDPPGNY G+ PY Sbjct: 68 SQLAADCNLVHSHGQYGENLAEGSGDFMTAAKAVEMWVDEKQYYDHDSNTCAQGQVCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCARVQCNNG-GYVVSCNYDPPGNYRGESPY 168
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. SwissProt
Match: PR1B_TOBAC (Pathogenesis-related protein 1B OS=Nicotiana tabacum PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 151.369 bits (381), Expect = 1.367e-36 Identity = 68/102 (66.67%), Postives = 82/102 (80.39%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGD-ITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 ++L A+C +VHS G YGENLA GSGD +T AV MW+ EK+YY+++SN+CA G CGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCA+VKCNNG ++SCNYDPPGN GQ PY Sbjct: 68 SQLAADCNLVHSHGQYGENLAQGSGDFMTAAKAVEMWVDEKQYYDHDSNTCAQGQVCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCARVKCNNG-GYVVSCNYDPPGNVIGQSPY 168
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. SwissProt
Match: PR1_SAMNI (Pathogenesis-related protein PR-1 type OS=Sambucus nigra PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 142.124 bits (357), Expect = 8.293e-34 Identity = 64/98 (65.31%), Postives = 80/98 (81.63%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NCQMVHSRGP-YGENLAWGSG-DITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 377 +C++VHS P YGENLA+GSG ++TG AV+MW+ E+ YN N+N+CA G CGHYTQVVWRNSVR+GCA+V+CNNG + I+CNY PPGNY GQRPY Sbjct: 71 DCRLVHSGDPRYGENLAFGSGFELTGRNAVDMWVAERNDYNPNTNTCAPGKVCGHYTQVVWRNSVRIGCARVRCNNG-AWFITCNYSPPGNYAGQRPY 167
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. SwissProt
Match: PRB1_TOBAC (Basic form of pathogenesis-related protein 1 OS=Nicotiana tabacum PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 140.969 bits (354), Expect = 1.847e-33 Identity = 66/113 (58.41%), Postives = 81/113 (71.68%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 63 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY---DINPFEVPL 392 N+ +C M+HS GPYGENLA + GAV MW+ EKR+Y+YNSNSC G CGHYTQVVWRNSVR+GCA+V+ NNG I+CNYDPPGN+ GQRP+ + PF+ L Sbjct: 61 NQRIGDCGMIHSHGPYGENLAAAFPQLNAAGAVKMWVDEKRFYDYNSNSCVGGV-CGHYTQVVWRNSVRLGCARVRSNNG-WFFITCNYDPPGNFIGQRPFGDLEEQPFDSKL 171
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. SwissProt
Match: PR12_HORVU (Pathogenesis-related protein PRB1-2 OS=Hordeum vulgare PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 135.191 bits (339), Expect = 1.014e-31 Identity = 58/98 (59.18%), Postives = 70/98 (71.43%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSG--DITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 377 +C++ HS GPYGEN+ WGS D AVN W+ EK+ YNY SN+CAAG CGHYTQVVWR S +GCA+V CNN R I+CNY+P GN GQ+PY Sbjct: 67 DCKLQHSGGPYGENIFWGSAGADWKAADAVNSWVNEKKDYNYGSNTCAAGKVCGHYTQVVWRASTSIGCARVVCNNNRGVFITCNYEPRGNIVGQKPY 164
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. SwissProt
Match: PR1_HORVU (Pathogenesis-related protein 1 OS=Hordeum vulgare PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 133.65 bits (335), Expect = 2.950e-31 Identity = 57/98 (58.16%), Postives = 71/98 (72.45%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSG--DITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 377 +C++ HS GPYGEN+ WGS D + AVN W+ EK+ Y+Y SN+CAAG CGHYTQVVWR S +GCA+V CNN R I+CNY+P GN GQ+PY Sbjct: 67 DCKLQHSGGPYGENIFWGSAGADWKASDAVNSWVSEKKDYDYGSNTCAAGKVCGHYTQVVWRASTSIGCARVVCNNNRGVFITCNYEPRGNIIGQKPY 164
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. SwissProt
Match: PR13_HORVU (Pathogenesis-related protein PRB1-3 OS=Hordeum vulgare PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 133.65 bits (335), Expect = 2.950e-31 Identity = 57/98 (58.16%), Postives = 71/98 (72.45%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSG--DITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 377 +C++ HS GPYGEN+ WGS D + AVN W+ EK+ Y+Y SN+CAAG CGHYTQVVWR S +GCA+V CNN R I+CNY+P GN GQ+PY Sbjct: 67 DCKLQHSGGPYGENIFWGSAGADWKASDAVNSWVSEKKDYDYGSNTCAAGKVCGHYTQVVWRASTSIGCARVVCNNNRGVFITCNYEPRGNIVGQKPY 164
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. SwissProt
Match: PR1_MEDTR (Pathogenesis-related protein PR-1 OS=Medicago truncatula GN=PR-1 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 132.494 bits (332), Expect = 6.571e-31 Identity = 55/102 (53.92%), Postives = 73/102 (71.57%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSG-DITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+ + +C + HS GPYGEN+ WGSG AV+ W+ EK++YNY NSC G CGHYTQVVW ++ +VGCA V C++ + T ++CNYDPPGNY G+RPY Sbjct: 72 NQRRNDCALEHSNGPYGENIFWGSGVGWNPAQAVSAWVDEKQFYNYWHNSCVDGEMCGHYTQVVWGSTTKVGCASVVCSDDKGTFMTCNYDPPGNYYGERPY 173
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TrEMBL
Match: Q3LF77_PEA (Putative basic PR1 OS=Pisum sativum GN=pr1b PE=3 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 219.935 bits (559), Expect = 6.378e-56 Identity = 97/98 (98.98%), Postives = 98/98 (100.00%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 99 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQ 392 N+LKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQ Sbjct: 65 NKLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQ 162
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TrEMBL
Match: B9S7V4_RICCO (STS14 protein, putative OS=Ricinus communis GN=RCOM_1381980 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 172.17 bits (435), Expect = 1.525e-41 Identity = 75/101 (74.26%), Postives = 85/101 (84.16%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+ K++C +VHS GPYGENLAW SGD++GT AV MWI EK YY+YNSNSCA+G CGHYTQVVWR+SVR+GCAKV CNNG T I CNYDPPGNY GQRPY Sbjct: 62 NQHKSDCSLVHSEGPYGENLAWSSGDLSGTDAVKMWIDEKPYYDYNSNSCASGQICGHYTQVVWRSSVRLGCAKVSCNNG-GTFIGCNYDPPGNYIGQRPY 161
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TrEMBL
Match: B9GIP3_POPTR (Predicted protein (Fragment) OS=Populus trichocarpa GN=POPTRDRAFT_175615 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 170.244 bits (430), Expect = 5.796e-41 Identity = 74/101 (73.27%), Postives = 84/101 (83.17%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N L+ C+MVHS GPYGENLAWGS D+ GTGAV MW+ E+ Y+YNSNSC G QC HYTQVVWRNSVR+GCAKV+CNNG T+ISCNYDPPGNYN QRP+ Sbjct: 62 NGLRDGCRMVHSGGPYGENLAWGSPDLAGTGAVKMWVDERANYDYNSNSCVGG-QCLHYTQVVWRNSVRLGCAKVRCNNGAGTLISCNYDPPGNYNDQRPF 161
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TrEMBL
Match: B9HN42_POPTR (Predicted protein OS=Populus trichocarpa GN=POPTRDRAFT_649729 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 167.548 bits (423), Expect = 3.757e-40 Identity = 71/101 (70.30%), Postives = 82/101 (81.19%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+ +C ++HS GPYGENLAW S D++GT AV MW+ EK YY+YNSNSCAAG QCGHYTQVVWRNS R+GCAKVKC+ G T I CNYDPPGNY GQ+PY Sbjct: 62 NQRAGDCNLIHSGGPYGENLAWSSADLSGTDAVKMWVDEKAYYDYNSNSCAAGQQCGHYTQVVWRNSARLGCAKVKCSTG-GTFIGCNYDPPGNYVGQKPY 161
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TrEMBL
Match: A9PEI1_POPTR (Predicted protein OS=Populus trichocarpa GN=POPTRDRAFT_581980 PE=2 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 167.162 bits (422), Expect = 4.906e-40 Identity = 71/101 (70.30%), Postives = 82/101 (81.19%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+ +C +VHS GPYGEN+AW S D++GT AV MW+ EK YY+YNSNSCAAG QCGHYTQVVWRNS R+GCAKVKC+ G T I CNYDPPGNY GQ+PY Sbjct: 62 NQRAGDCNLVHSGGPYGENIAWSSADLSGTDAVKMWVDEKAYYDYNSNSCAAGQQCGHYTQVVWRNSARLGCAKVKCSTG-GTFIGCNYDPPGNYVGQKPY 161
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TrEMBL
Match: B9P7C7_POPTR (Predicted protein OS=Populus trichocarpa GN=POPTRDRAFT_748543 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 165.236 bits (417), Expect = 1.864e-39 Identity = 70/101 (69.31%), Postives = 81/101 (80.20%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+ +C +VHS GPYGEN+AW S D++G AV MW+ EK YY+YNSNSCAAG QCGHYTQVVWRNS R+GCAKVKC+ G T I CNYDPPGNY GQ+PY Sbjct: 62 NQRAGDCNLVHSGGPYGENIAWSSADLSGADAVKMWVDEKAYYDYNSNSCAAGQQCGHYTQVVWRNSARLGCAKVKCSTG-GTFIGCNYDPPGNYVGQKPY 161
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TrEMBL
Match: B9S7V0_RICCO (STS14 protein, putative OS=Ricinus communis GN=RCOM_1381940 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 163.696 bits (413), Expect = 5.424e-39 Identity = 68/101 (67.33%), Postives = 82/101 (81.19%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+ A+C +VHS GPYGENLAWGSGD++G AV MW+ EK +Y+YNSN+C G QCGHYTQVVWR+S+ +GCAKV CNNG T+I+CNY PPGN GQRPY Sbjct: 66 NQRIADCNLVHSDGPYGENLAWGSGDLSGLDAVRMWVDEKAFYDYNSNTCTGGQQCGHYTQVVWRDSISLGCAKVTCNNGLGTLITCNYYPPGNVIGQRPY 166
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TrEMBL
Match: B9HN43_POPTR (Predicted protein OS=Populus trichocarpa GN=POPTRDRAFT_649730 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 163.696 bits (413), Expect = 5.424e-39 Identity = 69/101 (68.32%), Postives = 81/101 (80.20%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+ +C ++HS GPYGEN+AW S D++GT AV MW+ EK YY+YNSNSCAAG QCGHYTQVVWRNS R+GCAKVKC+ G T I CNYDPPGN GQ+PY Sbjct: 62 NQRAGDCNLIHSGGPYGENIAWSSADLSGTDAVKMWVDEKAYYDYNSNSCAAGQQCGHYTQVVWRNSARLGCAKVKCSTG-GTFIGCNYDPPGNVVGQKPY 161
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TrEMBL
Match: B9S7U9_RICCO (STS14 protein, putative OS=Ricinus communis GN=RCOM_1381930 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 163.31 bits (412), Expect = 7.085e-39 Identity = 68/96 (70.83%), Postives = 82/96 (85.42%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 377 +C++VHS G YGEN+AW SGD++GT AV +W+ EK +YNYNSN+CAAG QCGHYTQVVWRNSVR+GCAKV+C NG T I+CNYDPPGN+ QRPY Sbjct: 67 DCRLVHSGGRYGENIAWSSGDLSGTAAVKLWVDEKAFYNYNSNTCAAGQQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRLGCAKVRCRNG-GTFITCNYDPPGNFVNQRPY 161
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TrEMBL
Match: A5BC26_VITVI (Putative uncharacterized protein OS=Vitis vinifera GN=VITISV_042545 PE=4 SV=1) HSP 1 Score: 161.384 bits (407), Expect = 2.692e-38 Identity = 71/101 (70.30%), Postives = 85/101 (84.16%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+ ++C +VHS GPYGENLA GSG +TGT AVN+W+GEK YY+YNSNSC G +CGHYTQVVWRNSVR+GCA+V+CNNG ++CNYDPPGNY GQRPY Sbjct: 63 NQRISDCNLVHSGGPYGENLAKGSGSLTGTDAVNLWVGEKPYYDYNSNSCVGG-ECGHYTQVVWRNSVRLGCARVQCNNG-WWFVTCNYDPPGNYVGQRPY 161
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT2G14580.1 (| Symbols: ATPRB1, PRB1 | basic pathogenesis-related protein 1 | chr2:6225703-6226188 REVERSE LENGTH=161) HSP 1 Score: 157.532 bits (397), Expect = 1.954e-39 Identity = 69/101 (68.32%), Postives = 83/101 (82.18%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+LK +C++VHSRGPYGENLA GD++G AVN+W+ EK YNY++N+C CGHYTQVVWRNSVR+GCAKV+CNNG TIISCNYDPPGNY Q+PY Sbjct: 64 NQLKGDCRLVHSRGPYGENLAKSGGDLSGVAAVNLWVNEKANYNYDTNTCNG--VCGHYTQVVWRNSVRLGCAKVRCNNG-GTIISCNYDPPGNYANQKPY 161
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT2G14610.1 (| Symbols: PR1, PR 1, ATPR1 | pathogenesis-related gene 1 | chr2:6241944-6242429 REVERSE LENGTH=161) HSP 1 Score: 154.836 bits (390), Expect = 1.267e-38 Identity = 67/100 (67.00%), Postives = 81/100 (81.00%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 RLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 389 +L+ NC+++HS GPYGENLAWGSGD++G AVNMW+ EK YNY +N+C CGHYTQVVWR SVR+GCAKV+CNNG TIISCNYDP GNY ++PY Sbjct: 65 QLRGNCRLIHSGGPYGENLAWGSGDLSGVSAVNMWVSEKANYNYAANTCNG--VCGHYTQVVWRKSVRLGCAKVRCNNG-GTIISCNYDPRGNYVNEKPY 161
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT4G33720.1 (| Symbols: | CAP (Cysteine-rich secretory proteins, Antigen 5, and Pathogenesis-related 1 protein) superfamily protein | chr4:16182813-16183304 FORWARD LENGTH=163) HSP 1 Score: 148.288 bits (373), Expect = 1.185e-36 Identity = 64/101 (63.37%), Postives = 80/101 (79.21%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+ K +C M HS G YGEN+AW SG +TG AV+MW+ E+ Y+Y+SN+CA QCGHYTQVVWRNS R+GCAKV+CNNG+ T I+CNYDPPGN+ G+ PY Sbjct: 64 NQRKGDCAMKHSSGSYGENIAWSSGSMTGVAAVDMWVDEQFDYDYDSNTCAWDKQCGHYTQVVWRNSERLGCAKVRCNNGQ-TFITCNYDPPGNWVGEWPY 163
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT4G33710.1 (| Symbols: | CAP (Cysteine-rich secretory proteins, Antigen 5, and Pathogenesis-related 1 protein) superfamily protein | chr4:16181065-16181565 FORWARD LENGTH=166) HSP 1 Score: 139.428 bits (350), Expect = 5.506e-34 Identity = 62/102 (60.78%), Postives = 77/102 (75.49%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 RLKANCQMVHS--RGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 389 R K +C+++HS RG YGENLAW SGD++G AV +W+ EK Y + SN+C AG QCGHYTQVVW+NS VGCAKVKC+NG T ++CNY PGN G+RPY Sbjct: 66 RRKRDCRLIHSNSRGRYGENLAWSSGDMSGAAAVRLWVREKSDYFHKSNTCRAGKQCGHYTQVVWKNSEWVGCAKVKCDNG-GTFVTCNYSHPGNVRGRRPY 166
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT4G33730.1 (| Symbols: | CAP (Cysteine-rich secretory proteins, Antigen 5, and Pathogenesis-related 1 protein) superfamily protein | chr4:16185098-16185616 FORWARD LENGTH=172) HSP 1 Score: 136.732 bits (343), Expect = 3.569e-33 Identity = 62/95 (65.26%), Postives = 71/95 (74.74%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 CQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 374 C + HS GPYGENLA+GSGD++ AV MW+ EK YY++ SNSC G CGHYTQVVWR S R+GC K KCNNG S I+ CNYDP GNY G RPY Sbjct: 80 CSLEHSSGPYGENLAFGSGDMSAAQAVAMWVHEKSYYDFYSNSC-HGPACGHYTQVVWRGSARLGCGKAKCNNGAS-IVVCNYDPAGNYIGARPY 172
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT5G57625.1 (| Symbols: | CAP (Cysteine-rich secretory proteins, Antigen 5, and Pathogenesis-related 1 protein) superfamily protein | chr5:23337865-23338577 FORWARD LENGTH=207) HSP 1 Score: 135.961 bits (341), Expect = 6.088e-33 Identity = 58/102 (56.86%), Postives = 72/102 (70.59%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTG-AVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+ + +C + HS GPYGENL WGSG G AV WI E R YN+N+NSC CGHYTQ+VWR++ R+GCA+V C NG I+CNYDPPGNY G++PY Sbjct: 106 NQRRYDCSLTHSTGPYGENLFWGSGSSWAPGFAVQSWIVEGRSYNHNTNSCDGSGMCGHYTQMVWRDTKRLGCARVVCENGAGVFITCNYDPPGNYVGEKPY 207
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT4G25790.1 (| Symbols: | CAP (Cysteine-rich secretory proteins, Antigen 5, and Pathogenesis-related 1 protein) superfamily protein | chr4:13122248-13123290 REVERSE LENGTH=210) HSP 1 Score: 133.65 bits (335), Expect = 3.021e-32 Identity = 56/102 (54.90%), Postives = 71/102 (69.61%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSG-DITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+ + +C + HS GPYGENL WGSG D T T AV W E + YN+ +N+C CGHYTQ+VWR + R+GCA+V C NG I+CNYDPPGNY G++PY Sbjct: 109 NQRRYDCSLTHSTGPYGENLFWGSGSDFTSTFAVESWTVEAKSYNHMTNTCEGDGMCGHYTQIVWRETRRLGCARVVCENGAGVFITCNYDPPGNYVGEKPY 210
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT3G19690.1 (| Symbols: | CAP (Cysteine-rich secretory proteins, Antigen 5, and Pathogenesis-related 1 protein) superfamily protein | chr3:6842365-6842850 REVERSE LENGTH=161) HSP 1 Score: 132.88 bits (333), Expect = 5.154e-32 Identity = 57/98 (58.16%), Postives = 76/98 (77.55%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSC--AAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 377 +C +VHS GP+GEN+A SG+++ A MWI EK+YY+Y+SN+C G C HYTQVVW+N+VR+GCAKV CN+G T I+CNYDPPGNY G++P+ Sbjct: 65 DCALVHSNGPFGENIAMSSGEMSAEDAAEMWINEKQYYDYDSNTCNDPNGGTCLHYTQVVWKNTVRLGCAKVVCNSG-GTFITCNYDPPGNYIGEKPF 161
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT5G26130.1 (| Symbols: | CAP (Cysteine-rich secretory proteins, Antigen 5, and Pathogenesis-related 1 protein) superfamily protein | chr5:9128110-9128610 REVERSE LENGTH=166) HSP 1 Score: 131.339 bits (329), Expect = 1.500e-31 Identity = 59/100 (59.00%), Postives = 71/100 (71.00%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 KANCQMVHSR--GPYGENLAWGSGDITGTGAVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 383 K +C + HS G YGENLAW G ++G AV +W+ EK Y Y SN+C+ G QCGHYTQVVWR S VGCAKVKC+NG T ++CNY PPGNY G+ PY Sbjct: 68 KGDCSLTHSNSNGLYGENLAWSGGALSGAEAVKLWVNEKSDYIYASNTCSDGKQCGHYTQVVWRTSEWVGCAKVKCDNG-GTFVTCNYYPPGNYRGRWPY 166
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TAIR peptide
Match: AT4G30320.1 (| Symbols: | CAP (Cysteine-rich secretory proteins, Antigen 5, and Pathogenesis-related 1 protein) superfamily protein | chr4:14835833-14836318 FORWARD LENGTH=161) HSP 1 Score: 127.872 bits (320), Expect = 1.658e-30 Identity = 54/102 (52.94%), Postives = 71/102 (69.61%), Query Frame = -2 Query: 90 NRLKANCQMVHSRGPYGENLAWGSGDITGTG-AVNMWIGEKRYYNYNSNSCAAGYQCGHYTQVVWRNSVRVGCAKVKCNNGRSTIISCNYDPPGNYNGQRPY 392 N+ + +C + HS GPYGENL WGSG+ G A W+ E R YNY SNSC + CGHYTQ+VW+N+ ++GCA V CN G ++CNYDPPGN+ G++PY Sbjct: 61 NQRRGDCALTHSNGPYGENLFWGSGNRWGPSQAAYGWLSEARSYNYRSNSCNSE-MCGHYTQIVWKNTQKIGCAHVICNGGGGVFLTCNYDPPGNFLGRKPY 161 The following BLAST results are available for this feature:
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. SwissProt
Analysis Date: 2010-12-28 (Homology Analysis: Pisum sativum unigene v1 vs Swissprot) Total hits: 10
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TrEMBL
Analysis Date: 2010-12-28 (Homology Analysis: Pisum sativum unigene v1 vs Trembl) Total hits: 10
BLAST of Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 vs. TAIR peptide
Analysis Date: 2011-02-03 (Homology Analysis: Pisum sativum unigene v1 vs TAIR 10 peptide) Total hits: 10
InterPro
Analysis Name: InterProScan analysis for Pisum sativum unigene v1
Date Performed: 2010-12-29
Sequences
The
following sequences are available for this feature:
contig sequence >Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076 ID=Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076; Name=Pisum_sativum_v1_Contig3076; organism=Pisum sativum; type=contig; length=393bpback to top |